Jump to content

Least we will now know for definite ....


Recommended Posts

....on Saturday, whether Irvine is being told he has to play Soares (due to the high loan costs involved etc) or, if there is a clause in the loan agreement, saying he has to start every match.

Because, if he starts Saturday, after that performance, then it is clear that there is something going on above Alan, that we don't know about i.e. loan clause

Why is it clear? Maybe he can recognise an off performance every now and then but gives a player the chance if he knows deep down he can play.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who said anything about half the side ?

I am sure I just mentioned dropping Soares

That is one person...........

1 out of 11 makes about 9% of the team

Where did you get the other 41% from ?

Post # 10 mentions Potter.

I'm sure the others will be named in the hours to come. :mellow:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The criticism JJ got always bemused me, because he's the only player in the squad of unlocking a defence. Brilliant outlet, for an average team.

Furthermore, if McAllister can't get a game on Saturday, he might as well get his agent on the phone and start looking for another club, because he is totally wasting his time otherwise.

I agree that it's one bad result, but the warning signs have been around for a while. Drop Soares, Simek and Gray, and bring in McAllister, Hinds and Clarke. Play Tudgay wide, with Clarke and Varney up front. An element of shuffling the deck chairs on the titanic, but the side needs something different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

....on Saturday, whether Irvine is being told he has to play Soares (due to the high loan costs involved etc) or, if there is a clause in the loan agreement, saying he has to start every match.

Because, if he starts Saturday, after that performance, then it is clear that there is something going on above Alan, that we don't know about i.e. loan clause

oh dear....

Care to explain a little more? Or is it that imagination of yours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, worse than Buxton too which is ironic.

And worrying.

Thats what i thought, after all the hammer Buxton got earlier in the season.

I can't see Simek ever getting back to what he was before his injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it clear? Maybe he can recognise an off performance every now and then but gives a player the chance if he knows deep down he can play.

pardon ?

What has he contributed in the last 4 matches ?

This feeling that he can play, must be really, really deep down

He is very, very ineffective and has been apart from one good game against Newcastle

The sooner he is replaced the better. He didn't even offer anything defensively today, as he is a big fairy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pardon ?

What has he contributed in the last 4 matches ?

This feeling that he can play, must be really, really deep down

He is very, very ineffective and has been apart from one good game against Newcastle

The sooner he is replaced the better. He didn't even offer anything defensively today, as he is a big fairy.

Agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bleedin hell. Tudgay on the right? He is not a winger, can't play there at all.

no use as a goal scoring striker though is he ?

Least he can win some headers on the right (the only thing he actually has in his arsenal)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its got to be time to drop potter and give soares a chance in the middle Four defensive minded players (especially considering all four managed to forget how to defend tonight) is two many at home you need an outlet its a shame jj is injured but both soares and gray dont offer enough in the wide positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pardon ?

What has he contributed in the last 4 matches ?

This feeling that he can play, must be really, really deep down

He is very, very ineffective and has been apart from one good game against Newcastle

The sooner he is replaced the better. He didn't even offer anything defensively today, as he is a big fairy.

But seriously, you think The Chairman is telling Irvine who to pick? You think he'd stand for that?

You should be on the stage.

:laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...