Jump to content

Shez

Member
  • Content Count

    50
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Shez

  1. It’s not about punishing the club it’s about removing any advantage financial irregularities or actions that break financial fair play may give. The drawbacks are parachute payments (should be factored into financial fair play) and the vagueness (or lack of specifics) in the rules. Selling the ground etc to the current owner to purposely circumvent financial fair play shouldn’t be allowed (regardless of which year it shows up on the accounts). It should have been removed from profitability calculations for Wednesday, Reading, Derby and Villa and then any breaches dealt with as per the sliding scale of losses were beyond allowed...Wednesday got caught out due to the accounting anomaly...all should have had it removed but for the lack of foresight in the rules (and without punishment to the likes of Derby it would not be unfair to change/amend the rules and not allow others to do the same)
  2. Derby looking to put a bid in for Tyler Roberts..would likely be £7m To £10m...looks like they’re all clear to crack on
  3. It’s like getting caught drink driving then suggesting the police force need disbanding because it’s not fit for purpose because you’ve now got points on your license
  4. Yep.....Guardian is full of lies, The Sun’s SWFC agenda is the truth...
  5. Arthur Daley’s poo apprentice more like
  6. Astonishing.... Agenda against SWFC? Lol....12 points was a birthday present
  7. Parachute payments are needed to bridge the gap between the divisions....it absolutely shouldn’t be factored into FFP giving those clubs extra resources. Either increase amounts clubs can lose to match parachute payments or remove parachute amounts from relegated clubs P&S calculations
  8. -12 or -24.... what’s the difference?! fizz it....
  9. Buying the club would be like buying an engineless wooden boat full of holes for what you’d pay for a yacht....
  10. There is no agenda, just an unwillingness to accept blame lies with the club. Guess it was the corrupt/incompetent FL that signed the backdated signatures. They also failed to bring action in a timely manner so that punishment could be arbitrarily issued in a season that would have not punished the club after the accounts were issued promptly (as usual) and no attempt to avoid punishment or delay the hearings by the club....
  11. Wages for those £150m worth of players would likely hamper any club for years to come and recurring embargos/penaltys. The two teams getting parachute payments went up....yeh, but one did in a one off game v a team that finished above them and sold 2 players for £30m so that they could invest in their squad (compounded with good recruitment and a good manager) and the other finished 10 points behind the league winners who sold £30m worth of players to balance the books and help further squad improvements (compounded with good commercial revenue and a great manager). The key isn’t weeing and moaning about not been able to spend (despite the clubs costs being much much more than its turnover) it’s about planning, coaching, clever recruitment, a thriving academy, commercial partners, bums on seats, having a clear identity that everyone buys into (look at the promoted clubs). It’s not bickering, boycotting and spending silly..its togetherness, filling the stadium and planning.
  12. 25% of the votes were for less than 6 games, which is 2pts per game (more than the top two had when lockdown occured)....lol
  13. It's a 'rolling' 3 year period...which means every year there is accountability for the previous 3 years....there's no such thing as a reset. Would imagine cost cutting to continue as to not fall foul again
  14. Also means there’s no team beating everyone else so more points picked up by lesser clubs
  15. Can’t do this, it’s a sliding scale. Either the sale is allowed on the accounts it was placed = 0pts or it isn’t = 12pts
  16. Mistaking legality with rules... the stadium sale wasn’t illegal (like any breach of P&S isn’t illegal...it’s free trade), it has been deemed against the rules set out by the governing body, that’s all that’s in question. Whether the accounting is legal/above board/signed off/HMRC compliant...is irrelevant, legal minds can crack on, it’s the rules set out and agreed by the clubs that are the governing factor of any punishment
  17. The offence (ie subsequent non allowed losses following removal of stadium sale) is the highest to be brought to task, hence the higher punishment. It’s a rolling scale and fixed
  18. Sell? There’s very little revenue coming into the club that isn’t out of Chansiri’s own pocket, there’s low crowds (with much talk about not renewing/attending next year), a poor squad and a -12 star in a division already crippling the club financially within fair play rules. What would a buyer actually be buying?, what could they do with the club? They’d want to buy the club for peanuts whereas Chansiri would be looking at £10m+ This club can’t be sold under current operating conditions
  19. Clever...putting the sale on the year before and this year's accounts...double bubble. Will it be on next year's accounts as well...
  20. It could be said that bringing a club to task for cheating their accounts to gain advantage over others would be satisfying that mandate......rather than turn a blind eye to a dubious chairman seeking to ******** on the rules then try and hide that in the books.
  21. So they should let Chansiri off, guilty or not so that he can reshape the squad....for everyone's sake??
  22. Would be relegation for sure....to get into the current playoffs (6th) it would need more points than the current runaway champions.... Everyone currently outside the top 6 with -21 (and that's assuming the same form which would be unlikely with that weight around their necks) would now be in the bottom 3 and pretty much down 15 points has been turned around (by Leeds) who got into three playoffs (we on the first 5 on the bounce) but that was league one To summarise, to scrape into the playoffs the team would have to be comfortably the best in the division, to avoid relegation the team would need to be a top 3/4 team
  23. It probably wouldn't...or shouldn't, hence it's unlikely
×
×
  • Create New...