The clubs statement the other day raised some questions for me.
If as reported Ashley eventually splashed the cash, what is DC after from a legal point of view.
Is it tapping up a manager, because that never results in too much substantial.
Is it the fact no compensation was given, is so great crack on.
My fear is that DC being the stubborn guy he is, is just not accepting the Bruce resignation. The problem here is if this is the case, then we can’t appoint a new manager, because that would be a sign of acceptance.
Don't rule this out we are SWFC.