slinger208b

Recently, yes of course, and I was really close to not being bothered with it anymore. There just seemed to be no life or spark for the matches and dull, barely passionate reflections offered afterwards. I knew little of Paul Cook and began to warm to the idea of him becoming manager based on his decent record albeit of the lower end of the tree and admit I wasn't keen on the idea of Tony Pulis, mostly due to his tag. I initially fed off the restricted opinion of Pulis and his percieved style of football, but after looking into the teams he previously managed, there see

I am. Always optimistic...

love a good romp...

Fat Fingers...

if he hadn't signed any players then melt down on here...

Exactly...

What?..

In a couple of weeks including mid week games? Nah...

Very poor management would be putting a player before the team and not taking them off so as not to hurt their feelings. Good management makes the tough calls...

Okay...

He spoke about it in his arrival interviews...

Don’t see why. It’s old news...

It’s Lucky you haven’t seen the really bad ones then...

It’s November. Its Stoke. It will do until Pulis gets a chance to change things...

If it was the wrong change...

Another point in the bag...

Bannan did...

Love a good thumbing...

Goal number 1; Stop picking your nose...

No alluding took place, he blantantly stated...

Failing is the first step to succeeding...

Here comes Rhodes to get on t' end of Harris' crosses...

Problem is most people are qualified as a football manager after playing it on a computer...

Absolutely. Would've been good to retain him, but only at the right price...

Same fizz all as Stoke with 2 x possession...