Jump to content

deaks1984

Sheffield Wednesday Fan
  • Content Count

    83
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

131 Excellent

About deaks1984

  • Rank
    Sheffield Wednesday Youth Team

Recent Profile Visitors

1,556 profile views
  1. For any one that's confused https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/7706098/sky-sports-grovelling-apology-playing-crowd-noise-last-post-sheffield-derby/
  2. Are you sure it wasn't just Sky pumping that noise in?
  3. Ffs we won. We are top of the league. Just leave it enjoy it and stop criticising
  4. Not even gonna read the rest of the thread. Just gonna stick my neck out and call you a wee pipe!
  5. I don't know why this hasn't been mentioned before. I don't fancy his chances though to be honest, because someone just posted a taxi firms request to pick Chris Hughton up from the train station and take him to Hillsborough. IT'S HAPPENING!
  6. I can see from the line "Plus 2 wingers" that we are talking about the same sport, possibly even the same match. The use of bullet points makes the post clear as mud. The only thing that could have confused me even more is the use of a foreign language or hieroglyphics. Unless the whole thing is some sort of alien code, in which case I am completely lost.
  7. Think Buckwheat's been on the Buckfast again. Seriously can you explain the part about....all of it?
  8. Trying to figure this out after all the celebratory "we are top of the league" beers. Do you mean, you win coz none the of the list should be the next gaffer? If so bravo! And apologies for being so bladdered. Also your prize is an awesome German centre half called Borner. Sooner or later he will make people forget who Michael Hector was. Congrats. Top banana!
  9. I agree but I said it before hence the bump
  10. I know I've made some shiite calls before on here but I'm just gonna BUMP this one while I've got chance. I still believe we could do something special under Bullen. Might all go Pete Tong yet but I just hope that next time sections start chanting Bullen's name, that everyone joins in and we all back him!. Bloke deserves it and the club deserves success. Just hope He delivers.
  11. “He’s using his strength. And that is his strength – his strength.”
  12. How can you be sure he did do it? People are subject to false allegations all the time. There are instances such as domestic abuse where people make things up to make it look a lot worse than it really is. It's what is known as "playing the victim". People can be abusive without being racist. I think the fact that he admitted to some wrong doing should weigh in the side of his honesty. He could have denied being abusive altogether. People have been wrongly convicted of murder and had their character tarnished and life ruined when they have been innocent. And often in these instances it has been due to authorities being keen to show that they are pro-active and have manipulated situations, planted evidence, and even forced false statements from people. Corruption is rife within many authorities. I'm not saying the EFL or F.A. are corrupt but at the same time it's also possible for them to get things wrong., especially if they want to set precedence. I've said it before on here, I think the whole thing is a joke. You can't convict someone if there is reasonable doubt. Nothing has been proven and it's all based on possibility and probability. To make things even worse they changed the rules before they decided he was guilty of the "alleged" incident. So even if he was guilty, surely the rules which were in place at the time of the alleged incident should be applied, and therefore it should be a 5 match ban not 6. (Which I think at the very least, should be the outcome of an appeal). If we are in the business of changing rules and applying them retrospectively then can we have our parachute payments for relegation from the prem? Can someone break out the V.A.R. for Maradonna please?
  13. I think the whole thing is ridiculous. To me what makes it worse is the rules at the time of the incident meant if he was found guilty he would have been banned for 5 matches. So they decided to change the rules and then find him guilty and give him 6 matches. Personally I don't think he should get anything as the whole thing is based on possibility/probability. But surely even if he was found guilty then the rules which were in place at the time of the alleged incident should apply. If we are in the game of changing rules and then applying retrospectively, can we have some parachute payments following our relegation from the prem?
×
×
  • Create New...