Jump to content

jrh

Member
  • Content Count

    627
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

592 Excellent

About jrh

Recent Profile Visitors

2,016 profile views
  1. His performance when he came on in mid-week was appalling.
  2. Trouble is when we get in a position 25 yards from goal instead of putting a cross in why mess about with it come back inside, then back to full back and then back to the centre half.
  3. The one striker we do have has had 6 starts. The main 'striker' we play, can't control the ball, can't finish but runs about a lot and can take a long throw so he can play 90 minutes.
  4. How has Paterson stayed on all game? Pathetic. His touch is one of the worst I've seen. Not good signs if a manager leaves him on and his first set of substitutions include Kachunga when you need a goal. 10 minutes for Rhodes and Marriot to try and score. Hello league one.
  5. How has Paterson stayed on all game? Pathetic. His touch is one of the worst I've seen. Not good signs if a manager leaves him on and his first set of substitutions include Kachunga when you need a goal. 10 minutes for Rhodes and Marriot to try and score. Hello league one.
  6. Honestly I'd much rather us get some bodies forward and lump it. We are not good enough to play it out from the back and have no players that can beat a man (slight exception for Harris even though he's been shocking tonight) therefore playing it out to the back just means we will conceded more stupid goals.
  7. Canos also kicked the ball away when he was on a yellow. Again, only Hutchinson even looked to appeal for anything.
  8. Football is such a broken game. He purposely, with zero intent to play the ball, took him out and injured him. Of all the red cards we've had this season (ignore the last man challenges), not one of them had the intent that one did yet they get reds and his challenge gets rewarded by putting us down to 10 men.
  9. Play Rhodes, don't play Pelupessy. Although whoever we play I don't think we've got a chance of getting anything.
  10. Hutchinson is a very good championship footballer. He does the job you would want and expect of a defensive midfielder, wins the ball, has energy, breaks up play and is a good passer who doesn't give the ball away very often. I didn't by any means say it was his fault! I said I think we would have more points, there is a big difference.
  11. Did you watch the Stoke game? When pelupessy came on it was one of the worst substitute performances I've seen in a long time. And we'll blame Hutch for Shaw getting sent off and poor decisions from the manager. Honestly if you think Pelupessy is anywhere near good enough then there is no hope. He is always a yard behind the game, constantly gives away stupid fouls because he's too slow, only passes backwards or 2 yards to Bannan, he offers pretty much nothing positive.
  12. Joey Pelupessy playing the amount of games he has done for us is part of the reason we are in the trouble we are in. If we would have had Hutchinson playing instead of him all season we'd definitely be better off.
  13. I am also going on what I have seen not what these other manager's opinions are like you stated?
  14. I'm not a Rhodes fanatic, I just think he is better than what we have playing. If we had Joao, Fletcher and Hooper then his lack of game time would be a lot more understandable. But we don't unfortunately.
×
×
  • Create New...