Don't understand why, when the OP has started a topic criticising the Chairman, his attendance at games should make any influence on:
1. The validity of his opinion.
2. His right to an opinion.
Disagree with the content of the post all you want, but resorting to personal insults throughout is a tad embarrassing.
For what it's worth, I think if any of us were in DC's position we would have at least one thing we would want to do differently in terms of running the club.
Frustratingly, the answer and the reality isn't as straight forward as commenting on how team selection, shape or tactics would have influenced the outcome of a match.
As a fanbase we are ALL left annoyed at the lack of progress we are making - on and off the pitch - and verbalising said annoyance with both go hand in hand with poor results.
So yes, I accept that the level of apathy of how the club is run is at the lowest since DC bought the club. Obviously this would be the right topic to voice your frustrations about it. But keep it channelled to just that.
What would be the one thing you'd do if you were in DC's shoes that you think would bring about an effective change off the pitch?