Can easily just argue that 36 goals would have stood that everyone would have been angry about.
Also games are lasting closer to 80 minutes now rather than the 60 minutes we had before, so closer to 90 now.
If people are willing to pay that then surely that's a good thing for English football. Shows how valuable it is and I don't think we are near the top yet?
Not 100% correct because rugby has that relative velocity rule so you can catch the ball Infront of where the player released it if leaves his hands going backwards
Why would it?
Losing the big teams would mean a lot less tv sponsorship money English premier League. So lot less subsidies for lower leagues. Wages and quality of players would then decrease but you would still have the clubs and owners that are being unsustainable trying to reach the top division.
They do it get money at the end of year 1 anyway. But I guess the argument is you need at least the security of 3 years parachute payments to make it worth trying to compete.