[WTIDgroup]

Please follow the link below to view the Q&A raised in response to the general queries received relating to WTID.


Link to Q & A

[Fulham Fox]

WTIDgroup, on 30 July 2010 - 02:47 PM, said:

Please follow the link below to view the Q&A raised in response to the general queries received relating to WTID.


Link to Q & A

Will you be sending out logins shortly ?

[Morrisontobelieve]

Fulham Fox, on 30 July 2010 - 02:54 PM, said:

Will you be sending out logins shortly ?

will we need one? there isn't a forum on there as yet

[Fulham Fox]

Morrisontobelieve, on 30 July 2010 - 02:57 PM, said:

will we need one? there isn't a forum on there as yet

Sorry, I thought that we needed to login to view offering materials as these cannot be distributed publically under FSA rules (investment advertisements). So I guess I assumed these would be behind a login of some sort.

[southportdc]

couldn't you PM that rather than making it look like they might be missing something MC?

[Fulham Fox]

southportdc, on 30 July 2010 - 03:03 PM, said:

couldn't you PM that rather than making it look like they might be missing something MC?

ok

[southportdc]

Fulham Fox, on 30 July 2010 - 03:05 PM, said:

ok

thanks xx

[Fulham Fox]

southportdc, on 30 July 2010 - 03:06 PM, said:

thanks xx

Done

[eDDie]

Fulham Fox, on 30 July 2010 - 03:11 PM, said:

Done

Don't forget to mention the due diligence thing. It's important.

http://www.owlstalk.co.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/blush.gif

[Fulham Fox]

eDDie, on 30 July 2010 - 03:13 PM, said:

Don't forget to mention the due diligence thing. It's important.

http://www.owlstalk.co.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/blush.gif

Can you PM me phone numbers Eddie

[POLITICAL_BULL]

southportdc, on 30 July 2010 - 02:03 PM, said:

couldn't you PM that rather than making it look like they might be missing something MC?

That would imply that he wasn't a first rate cock.

[eDDie]

POLITICAL_BULL, on 30 July 2010 - 03:18 PM, said:

That would imply that he wasn't a first rate cock.

A NEW CONTENDER APPEARS

[southportdc]

POLITICAL_BULL, on 30 July 2010 - 03:18 PM, said:

That would imply that he wasn't a first rate cock.

What a first post. http://www.owlstalk.co.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif

[hugeowl]

POLITICAL_BULL, on 30 July 2010 - 03:18 PM, said:

That would imply that he wasn't a first rate cock.

Is that you Lee ? :rolleyes:

[Fulham Fox]

POLITICAL_BULL, on 30 July 2010 - 03:18 PM, said:

That would imply that he wasn't a first rate cock.

The "rate my manhood section" is elsewhere (as you are new to this)

[intercity0wl]

POLITICAL_BULL, on 30 July 2010 - 03:18 PM, said:

That would imply that he wasn't a first rate cock.

Wow, the sort of post that makes me think he's been here before.

[HarrowbyOwl]

eDDie, on 30 July 2010 - 03:19 PM, said:

A NEW CONTENDER APPEARS

..like the proverbial political bull in the political china shop

[HarrowbyOwl]

eDDie, on 30 July 2010 - 03:19 PM, said:

A NEW CONTENDER APPEARS

..like the proverbial political bull in the political china shop

[longreach]

eDDie, on 30 July 2010 - 03:19 PM, said:

A NEW CONTENDER APPEARS

I'll give it 5

[Fulham Fox]

intercity0wl, on 30 July 2010 - 03:27 PM, said:

Wow, the sort of post that makes me think he's been here before.

5 Bills not 4 ?

[southportdc]

POLITICAL_BULL, on 30 July 2010 - 03:18 PM, said:

That would imply that he wasn't a first rate cock.

So what was your former/is your other username? Transparency and all.

[longreach]

Fulham Fox, on 30 July 2010 - 03:29 PM, said:

5 Bills not 4 ?

Works for me :laugh:

[Sonny]

POLITICAL_BULL, on 30 July 2010 - 03:18 PM, said:

That would imply that he wasn't a first rate cock.

Can't you take this somewhere else mate? Before another thread is ruined by the usual rubbish.

Quote

The original concept of WTID was born from a meeting of several Sheffield Wednesday fans from different groups, one of which was Wednesdayite.

The aim: to unify and represent the support base as one entity
The objective: To heal division and seek out financial investment from within the City and from the worldwide fan base.
The method: An investment proposal, attractive to the larger investor and the general fan base.

[Sam779]

Exactly what Sonny said.

Save the nonsense for the many other threads.

[POLITICAL_BULL]

Fulham Fox, on 30 July 2010 - 02:01 PM, said:

Sorry, I thought that we needed to login to view offering materials as these cannot be distributed publically under FSA rules (investment advertisements). So I guess I assumed these would be behind a login of some sort.

Before posting something such as the above (unless I had an alternative agenda - or was just somebody who liked attention), I would check that WTID had not taken legal advice on the above, or maybe even advice from the FSA.

If I was advising them on the above (which I am not), I would have said that regardless of the legislation there is not enough detail for any investor to make a decision nor is there any obvious way for an investment to be made. Furthermore, they appear to have made a conscious decision to not answer any questions of a finance nature. Therefore, based on previous precedents, it is highly likely that the FSA would not take any legal action.

Indeed there are certain football supporter groups that gave far more financial information and received pledges running into millions without falling foul of FSA action.

I would also ask whether they had actually been in contact with the FSA and what the response was.

Furthermore, I would do all of the above in private so as not to cast any aspersions over anybody or any group when I didn't have all of the facts to hand.

Then again, I conduct my business with integrity.

[southportdc]

POLITICAL_BULL, on 30 July 2010 - 03:53 PM, said:

Before posting something such as the above (unless I had an alternative agenda - or was just somebody who liked attention), I would check that WTID had not taken legal advice on the above, or maybe even advice from the FSA.

If I was advising them on the above (which I am not), I would have said that regardless of the legislation there is not enough detail for any investor to make a decision nor is there any obvious way for an investment to be made. Furthermore, they appear to have made a conscious decision to not answer any questions of a finance nature. Therefore, based on previous precedents, it is highly likely that the FSA would not take any legal action.

Indeed there are certain football supporter groups that gave far more financial information and received pledges running into millions without falling foul of FSA action.

I would also ask whether they had actually been in contact with the FSA and what the response was.

Furthermore, I would do all of the above in private so as not to cast any aspersions over anybody or any group when I didn't have all of the facts to hand.

Then again, I conduct my business with integrity.

before i questioned the agenda of someone who has been honest about who and what they are, I'd stop hiding behind a username taking cheap shots. Jog on dickhead.

[hugeowl]

POLITICAL_BULL, on 30 July 2010 - 03:53 PM, said:

Before posting something such as the above (unless I had an alternative agenda - or was just somebody who liked attention), I would check that WTID had not taken legal advice on the above, or maybe even advice from the FSA.

If I was advising them on the above (which I am not), I would have said that regardless of the legislation there is not enough detail for any investor to make a decision nor is there any obvious way for an investment to be made. Furthermore, they appear to have made a conscious decision to not answer any questions of a finance nature. Therefore, based on previous precedents, it is highly likely that the FSA would not take any legal action.

Indeed there are certain football supporter groups that gave far more financial information and received pledges running into millions without falling foul of FSA action.

I would also ask whether they had actually been in contact with the FSA and what the response was.

Furthermore, I would do all of the above in private so as not to cast any aspersions over anybody or any group when I didn't have all of the facts to hand.

Then again, I conduct my business with integrity.

Post No 1 suggests otherwise .

[longreach]

I think you've got a vowl disorder Pollitical BILL.

Just do one and leave this thread alone...tail

[Fulham Fox]

POLITICAL_BULL, on 30 July 2010 - 03:53 PM, said:

Before posting something such as the above (unless I had an alternative agenda - or was just somebody who liked attention), I would check that WTID had not taken legal advice on the above, or maybe even advice from the FSA.

If I was advising them on the above (which I am not), I would have said that regardless of the legislation there is not enough detail for any investor to make a decision nor is there any obvious way for an investment to be made. Furthermore, they appear to have made a conscious decision to not answer any questions of a finance nature. Therefore, based on previous precedents, it is highly likely that the FSA would not take any legal action.

Indeed there are certain football supporter groups that gave far more financial information and received pledges running into millions without falling foul of FSA action.

I would also ask whether they had actually been in contact with the FSA and what the response was.

Furthermore, I would do all of the above in private so as not to cast any aspersions over anybody or any group when I didn't have all of the facts to hand.

Then again, I conduct my business with integrity.

If you knew as much as you claim you would realise that legal action is not the recourse under that specific rule.

The rest is safely PM'd

Finally, can I recommend sex and travel.

[steelowl]

Sam779, on 30 July 2010 - 03:39 PM, said:

Exactly what Sonny said.

Save the nonsense for the many other threads.