David1867 Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 Both on the bench for boro today. Forshaw signed a new contract too. Not it good as all 3 have been mentioned as potential targets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wilyfox Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 McManaman not involved though.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David1867 Posted August 28, 2016 Author Share Posted August 28, 2016 Just now, wilyfox said: McManaman not involved though.. True, I wasn't looking out for him to be fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wilyfox Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 I think our chances of Reach are screwed over by injuries to all 3 of Boro's LBs. I suspect they'll hang onto him for cover. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MysticOwl Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 Whatever it takes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areNOTwhatTHEYseem Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 6 minutes ago, iliveinthenow said: Whatever it takes! We can't force Middlesbrough to sell us their players, though! If they decide they need Reach, what can we do about it? Just like us, they have a chairman who will do what's best for his club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueblood Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 55 minutes ago, wilyfox said: McManaman not involved though.. According to Staton, we turned down the chance to sign mcmanaman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wilyfox Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 1 minute ago, Blueblood said: According to Staton, we turned down the chance to sign mcmanaman I know, but circumstances could change if other attempts are thwarted. Loan to buy, possibly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blueblood Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 Yeah hopefully we can do the same as we did with Sasso. But will the player fancy it after being turned down is the worry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wilyfox Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 Neither made it off the bench. Both unused subs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelcityowlsfan Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 We should get Rhodes on loan. The chances are coming but we aren't sticking them away. Rhodes is lethal at this level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUMBELOWS91 Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 3 minutes ago, steelcityowlsfan said: We should get Rhodes on loan. The chances are coming but we aren't sticking them away. Rhodes is lethal at this level. Only way I see this happening is if Hooper and/or FF move on. Then we could be in the running. Otherwise, it doesn't fit financially or from the perspective of squad numbers in that position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holmowl Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 10 minutes ago, steelcityowlsfan said: We should get Rhodes on loan. The chances are coming but we aren't sticking them away. Rhodes is lethal at this level. So is Hooper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holmowl Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 Just throwing this into the mix. Rhodes went through two goal droughts last season, of 9 matches and 8 matches. Year before, two batches of five goalless matches. Year before 8 match run goalless. Fans will need to show far far more patience and faith in him than they do in Hooper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codrowe Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 16 minutes ago, Holmowl said: So is Hooper Hooper is lethal at an all you can eat buffet thats about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigthinrob Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 4 minutes ago, Holmowl said: Just throwing this into the mix. Rhodes went through two goal droughts last season, of 9 matches and 8 matches. Year before, two batches of five goalless matches. Year before 8 match run goalless. Fans will need to show far far more patience and faith in him than they do in Hooper. In a team that created very few chances compared to us. Rhodes is in a different stratosphere to Hooper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holmowl Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 4 minutes ago, codrowe said: Hooper is lethal at an all you can eat buffet thats about it Despite which he scores more regularly than any other Wednesday forward for 20 years. But let's keep knocking him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelcityowlsfan Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 No reason we can't keep hooper and move on some other players. As I said before ship out McGugan, Nuhui, Dielna, Bus and Sogou and that should free the wages up for Rhodes loan. He's deadly at this level and would make the difference in those tight games where we might only get 1 or 2 chances. I like Hooper but Rhodes is a better goal scorer in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pride_of_the_road Posted August 29, 2016 Share Posted August 29, 2016 Rhodes might go back to Hudders if they stay top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
since59owe Posted August 29, 2016 Share Posted August 29, 2016 Rhodes is out of Reach, but Reach is not ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now