SallyCinnamon Posted September 1, 2015 Author Share Posted September 1, 2015 People take this Nixon bloke seriously? You're all f*cking daft. Hard not to when he's been right on almost everything Wednesday related this transfer window. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StudentOwl Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Bullshit. Nixon said the other day everything was agreed on our side & on Hooper's side. Said Norwich were the problem! How're you feeling FO regarding the lack of striker signing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigdan2003 Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Need to tune into Twitter tonight and watch the pitch fork brigade round up on Hooper..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shawie99 Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 You gotta call bull$hit on this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mkowl Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Footballers are so precious these days it wouldn't surprise me if it was true. Anyway if he'd waited he could have had Stevie Mays Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manila_Owl Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Hooper can do one.....pampered... overpaid...over rated...egotistical...self opinionated....not good enough for us.....box less w&nk&r Coming from the guy with the username twolaptops. Flashy barsteward Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheffield_dave Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Hard not to when he's been right on almost everything Wednesday related this transfer window. Engage your brain. Refer to Bruce's post above. Transfers are complex business. Fees agreed, maybe even 7 figure ones. Wages agreed, a percentage on our part (100%?) agreed to pay to the tune of tens of thousands a week. Then at the last minute Hooper says "Oh can I have a free box? No? Sod it then". It's absolute drivel and a direct contradiction of stuff Nixon himself has previously said. So if Nixon has been right about almost everything to do with us this summer, he's 50% wrong on one of his two statements about a deal for Hooper. Which is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyingOwl Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 How're you feeling FO regarding the lack of striker signing? I'm over it already. It is what is is. And we've not seen FF and Bannan so have no idea of the impact they'll have. FF to play behind Nuhiu or Joao and you just never know...something could click. If not we have a loan window that we can utilise. Plenty of strikers still out there....Hooper being one of them if he's not too hurt over us ''not giving him a box''. It is the hope that kills you really. If we weren't told/didn't convince ourselves that we had the pick of Rhodes, Vydra, McCormack and Hooper then we wouldn't be like this. It would have been fantastic to get that elusive striker but there's never any guarantee that the player would do well for us, and you never miss what you've never had I'm still over the moon that we've signed Forestieri. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slinger208b Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 I don't follow him and refuse to follow someone who won't have his tweets publically displayed. Unlucky... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cersei Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReginaldD Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 I'm glad we didn't jump through hoops for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRUCE LEE Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 I've heard his loan to Fulham fell through because they wouldn't let him wear pink boots Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Deleted member Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 I call fact Not bullshit You're a striker, being paid £32k a week. You're playing for a Premiership club, but they've made it clear they want you out on loan as you're not getting a game this season. You've bought and paid for a box for the season for family and friends to watch you play in the Premiership. You've been told a deals been agreed with Wednesday, you're happy enough to go and play there - the money is the same. Norwich refuse to refund your box. Wednesday refuse to provide a box for your family and friends to prevent you being out of pocket, even though you've explained the situation to them, and said as long as you get a box for your family and friends so you arent out of pocket, you're happy. Wednesday have agreed to pay your wages in full (to Norwich) for the loan period, and agreed to pay a loan fee (to Norwich) as well. You're getting nothing out of the deal (other than the inconvenience of spending 8 months living away from your home and the chance to play in a division you've just played your heart out to get out of.... Whats so hard to understand? Why should he be out of pocket? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalthamOwl Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 (edited) I don't believe it (meldrew style) Edited September 1, 2015 by WalthamOwl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlyingOwl Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 I call fact Not bullshit You're a striker, being paid £32k a week. You're playing for a Premiership club, but they've made it clear they want you out on loan as you're not getting a game this season. You've bought and paid for a box for the season for family and friends to watch you play in the Premiership. You've been told a deals been agreed with Wednesday, you're happy enough to go and play there - the money is the same. Norwich refuse to refund your box. Wednesday refuse to provide a box for your family and friends to prevent you being out of pocket, even though you've explained the situation to them, and said as long as you get a box for your family and friends so you arent out of pocket, you're happy. Wednesday have agreed to pay your wages in full (to Norwich) for the loan period, and agreed to pay a loan fee (to Norwich) as well. You're getting nothing out of the deal (other than the inconvenience of spending 8 months living away from your home and the chance to play in a division you've just played your heart out to get out of.... Whats so hard to understand? Why should he be out of pocket? It's all believable when you put it that way. However it's not believable when Nixon reiterated several times over the past few days that the deal isn't an issue with us or Hooper but an issue with Norwich. Then said that Norwich will only release Hooper when they have brought in a striker (2 strikers that changed to). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scram Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Loan fee - Agreed Pay 100% of his wages - Agreed Free box - Nah soz m8 Utter dribble Absolutely right. As if a deal in the millions would break down over something that costs the club nothing g Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaminyPie Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Its so daft that its probably true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Deleted member Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 It's all believable when you put it that way. However it's not believable when Nixon reiterated several times over the past few days that the deal isn't an issue with us or Hooper but an issue with Norwich. Then said that Norwich will only release Hooper when they have brought in a striker (2 strikers that changed to). I'd say the issue IS with Norwich Not refunding him his box Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shawie99 Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 I call fact Not bullshit You're a striker, being paid £32k a week. You're playing for a Premiership club, but they've made it clear they want you out on loan as you're not getting a game this season. You've bought and paid for a box for the season for family and friends to watch you play in the Premiership. You've been told a deals been agreed with Wednesday, you're happy enough to go and play there - the money is the same. Norwich refuse to refund your box. Wednesday refuse to provide a box for your family and friends to prevent you being out of pocket, even though you've explained the situation to them, and said as long as you get a box for your family and friends so you arent out of pocket, you're happy. Wednesday have agreed to pay your wages in full (to Norwich) for the loan period, and agreed to pay a loan fee (to Norwich) as well. You're getting nothing out of the deal (other than the inconvenience of spending 8 months living away from your home and the chance to play in a division you've just played your heart out to get out of.... Whats so hard to understand? Why should he be out of pocket? 32 grand a week and he is out of pocket ? are you trolling? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southportdc Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 I call fact Not bullshit You're a striker, being paid £32k a week. You're playing for a Premiership club, but they've made it clear they want you out on loan as you're not getting a game this season. You've bought and paid for a box for the season for family and friends to watch you play in the Premiership. You've been told a deals been agreed with Wednesday, you're happy enough to go and play there - the money is the same. Norwich refuse to refund your box. Wednesday refuse to provide a box for your family and friends to prevent you being out of pocket, even though you've explained the situation to them, and said as long as you get a box for your family and friends so you arent out of pocket, you're happy. Wednesday have agreed to pay your wages in full (to Norwich) for the loan period, and agreed to pay a loan fee (to Norwich) as well. You're getting nothing out of the deal (other than the inconvenience of spending 8 months living away from your home and the chance to play in a division you've just played your heart out to get out of.... Whats so hard to understand? Why should he be out of pocket? It doesn't chime with the previous statement from the same source that we did all we could to make the transfer go through. So one of his statements is clearly false. And given that, why would you trust the other? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now